WebFX 200 - Benchmarks

All software was tested with 100% dithering set and any optimisation set if this resulted in a smaller file size. In the graphs below, larger values indicate a worse result.

GIF Support

Overall Results

chart1.gif (11906 bytes)

 

The overall figure was calculated by averaging the percentage of the original file sizes from the three tests below. Hence the lower the figure, the better the average performance.

 

Photo Images

Original Image 620x576 photo scan, in PNG format 545,581 bytes
50 Color Adaptive Palette

chart4.gif (8810 bytes)

25 Color adaptive palette

chart2.gif (8297 bytes)

Web Style Banner

Original image 150x40 web style graphic, in PNG format 3,714 bytes.
Format used was a 15 color adaptive palette

chart3.gif (7840 bytes)

All tests results also apply to Satori FilmFX / FilmFX64

These tests were also repeated using the JPEG format rather than GIF, but it was decided not to publish the figures obtained because of problems assessing image quality. The JPEG tests indicated that file sizes were all very similar for equivalent quality, with Satori producing slightly smaller files.

 

Conclusion

Satori WebFX 2000 & Macromedia Fireworks consistently performed well in all tests. Images exported by either product were highly optimized (small file size) but also maintained the highest image quality compared to the other products under test

After taking all test results into consideration, Satori WebFX 2000 was found to be placed best overall.